Understanding the 13 Factors Florida Courts Use to Decide Relocation Cases

Relocation cases are among the most difficult disputes in family court. One parent wants to move forward with a new opportunity or relationship, while the other parent fears losing meaningful time with their child. The court must step in and decide what is truly in the child's best interests.

Under Florida law, a parent cannot relocate with a child more than 50 miles away for more than 60 consecutive days without either the written consent of the other parent or a court order.

When parents cannot agree, the judge must evaluate the relocation request using 13 statutory factors found in Florida Statute 61.13001. Judges are required to examine each factor and explain in writing how those factors influence the final decision. Understanding these factors can help parents better prepare for relocation litigation and avoid common mistakes.

---

Factor 1: The Child's Relationship With Each Parent

The court begins by examining the child's relationship with each parent and with other important people in the child's life.

This includes looking at the child's relationship with siblings, grandparents, and other family members who may be affected by the move. Judges want to understand how the relocation would affect the stability and emotional connections the child currently has.

A strong and active relationship with both parents can make relocation more difficult to justify because the move could significantly disrupt that relationship.

---

Factor 2: Age, Development, and Needs of the Child

The court considers the child's age and stage of development when evaluating relocation.

Young children, teenagers, and children with special needs may be affected very differently by a move. Judges may look at emotional maturity, educational needs, and the child's ability to adapt to change.

The court will also consider whether the proposed relocation environment can meet those developmental needs.

---

Factor 3: Feasibility of Preserving the Parent–Child Relationship

One of the most important questions in relocation cases is whether the non-moving parent will still be able to maintain a meaningful relationship with the child.

The court evaluates whether realistic arrangements can be made to preserve that relationship. Travel time, transportation costs, school schedules, and the practicality of frequent communication are all relevant.

If relocation would severely limit contact between the child and the other parent, the court may view the move more critically.

---

Factor 4: The Child's Preference

If the child is old enough and mature enough, the court may consider the child's preference regarding the relocation.

However, children rarely testify directly in court. More commonly, their perspective is presented through a Guardian ad Litem, therapist, or other neutral professional.

Even when a child expresses a clear preference, that preference is only one factor among many.

---

Factor 5: Enhancement of the Child's Quality of Life

The relocating parent must often demonstrate that the move will improve the quality of life for the child and for the relocating parent.

Examples may include better employment opportunities, improved housing, access to educational resources, or increased support from extended family members.

The court examines whether the benefits of the relocation are real and significant rather than speculative.

---

Factor 6: The Reasons Each Parent Is Taking Their Position

Judges look carefully at the motivations of both parents.

If the relocation request appears to be made in good faith for legitimate reasons such as employment or family support, the court may view the request more favorably.

On the other hand, if the relocation appears to be an attempt to interfere with the other parent's relationship with the child, that motivation may weigh heavily against the move.

---

Factor 7: Economic Circumstances of the Parents

Relocation cases often involve financial considerations.

The court may examine whether the move would improve the economic stability of the household or provide better opportunities for employment. Financial stability can affect a child's living conditions, education, and overall well-being.

At the same time, the court also considers whether relocation would impose significant financial burdens on the non-moving parent.

---

Factor 8: History of Substance Abuse or Domestic Violence

The safety of the child is always a primary concern.

If there is any history of domestic violence, child abuse, or substance abuse involving either parent, the court must consider how those issues affect the child's well-being and safety.

These concerns can significantly influence the court's decision regarding relocation.

---

Factor 9: Ability to Foster the Parent–Child Relationship

Courts pay close attention to which parent is more likely to encourage and support a continuing relationship between the child and the other parent.

Evidence that one parent interferes with time-sharing, undermines the other parent, or fails to cooperate in co-parenting arrangements can become extremely important.

Relocation may be denied if the court believes the move will damage the child's relationship with the other parent.

---

Factor 10: Career Opportunities

The court evaluates the employment opportunities available to each parent in both the current and proposed locations.

Sometimes relocation is connected to a job offer, military assignment, or career advancement opportunity that may provide financial benefits for the family.

The court considers whether those opportunities are legitimate and whether they meaningfully improve the family's circumstances.

---

Factor 11: Good Faith of the Relocation Request

The court examines whether the relocation request is being made in good faith.

A relocation request made solely to limit the other parent's involvement in the child's life may be viewed negatively by the court. Judges look for evidence that the parent requesting the move is acting honestly and reasonably.

---

Factor 12: Career Opportunities for the Objecting Parent

In some cases, the court may consider whether the non-relocating parent could reasonably relocate as well.

This does not mean the court expects the parent to move, but it may consider whether employment opportunities exist for that parent in the new location and whether relocation would completely disrupt that parent's career or financial stability.

---

Factor 13: Any Other Factor Affecting the Child's Best Interests

The final factor allows the court to consider any additional circumstances that may affect the child's well-being.

This flexible factor allows judges to examine the unique dynamics of each family situation. Issues such as the child's community ties, educational environment, and emotional stability may all be considered.

---

Why These Factors Matter

Relocation cases are not decided based on a single argument or dramatic moment in court.

Instead, judges carefully weigh the totality of the circumstances by analyzing each of the 13 statutory factors. The ultimate question remains the same in every case: what outcome best serves the child's long-term interests.

Parents involved in relocation disputes often benefit from understanding these factors early in the process. When the case eventually reaches trial, the judge will evaluate the evidence through this framework.

---

Bottom Line

Relocation cases require courts to balance a parent's desire to move forward in life with a child's need for stability and meaningful relationships with both parents.

The 13 relocation factors provide the legal structure courts use to make that decision.

Understanding those factors can help parents focus on what truly matters when relocation becomes part of a family law case.